Database error: Invalid SQL: select count(id) from pwn_comment where pid='142671' and iffb='1'
MySQL Error: 1194 (Table 'pwn_comment' is marked as crashed and should be repaired)
#0 dbbase_sql->halt(Invalid SQL: select count(id) from pwn_comment where pid='142671' and iffb='1') called at [D:\wwwroot\s154\wwwroot\includes\db.inc.php:55] #1 dbbase_sql->query(select count(id) from {P}_comment where pid='142671' and iffb='1') called at [D:\wwwroot\s154\wwwroot\comment\module\CommentContent.php:65] #2 CommentContent() called at [D:\wwwroot\s154\wwwroot\includes\common.inc.php:524] #3 PrintPage() called at [D:\wwwroot\s154\wwwroot\comment\html\index.php:13] Database error: Invalid SQL: select * from pwn_comment where pid='142671' and iffb='1' order by id limit 0,10
MySQL Error: 1194 (Table 'pwn_comment' is marked as crashed and should be repaired)
#0 dbbase_sql->halt(Invalid SQL: select * from pwn_comment where pid='142671' and iffb='1' order by id limit 0,10) called at [D:\wwwroot\s154\wwwroot\includes\db.inc.php:55] #1 dbbase_sql->query(select * from {P}_comment where pid='142671' and iffb='1' order by id limit 0,10) called at [D:\wwwroot\s154\wwwroot\comment\module\CommentContent.php:167] #2 CommentContent() called at [D:\wwwroot\s154\wwwroot\includes\common.inc.php:524] #3 PrintPage() called at [D:\wwwroot\s154\wwwroot\comment\html\index.php:13] 网友点评--家居饰品商城|苏州大宗商品交易中心毛
网站标志
商品搜索
您好!欢迎光临家居饰品商城|苏州大宗商品交易中心毛 
点评详情
发布于:2017-12-2 13:53:16  访问:26 次 回复: 篇
版主管理 | 推荐 | 删除 | 删除并扣分
Item 42) was perceived as problematic because capacity depended around the characteristics
Despite the fact that typical themes had been identified in this study as well as the preceding German study, caution has to be exercised when generalising findings. Generalisability, as conceptualised in empirical quantitative analysis, will not be normally sought in qualitative research which seeks theoretical generalisability.ten Participant checking ( participants giving feedback on the findings) was not undertaken in this study. Similarity to other published work Two earlier research have addressed the respondents‘ perspectives on self-reported health status questionnaires. The first study explored how older individuals with chronic wellness troubles interpreted questions in theIrritating content Content material could rstb.2014.0252 in some cases trigger respondents to feel patronised, for instance inquiries on depression (AQLQ-S and LWAQ).Item 42) was perceived as problematic for the reason that potential depended around the characteristics of the stairs.Effectively I suppose when they ask you (...) should you can stroll up a flight of stairs. And after that you realise which you did have a situation where you couldn‘t stroll up some stairs, but the cause was simply because they had been very lengthy and particularly higher. (P19)contrast, the AQLQ-J was perceived as a `narrow‘ `medical‘ questionnaire using a focus on symptoms, environment and functional ability. The selection of relevant activities was perceived to be constructive by some and complicated by other folks. The AQLQ-S was described as a basic, quick and uncomplicated questionnaire, but there was also a perception that it simultaneously lacked depth. Overall, the AQLQ-S was felt to be located `between‘ the AQLQ-J and the LWAQ around the `medical‘ emotional‘ spectrum. Strengths and weaknesses of this research This novel study elicits patients‘ views around the 2013/480630 content validity of various questionnaires that purport to measure the same construct (HrQoL) for asthma. We interviewed adults having a wide age range and range of disease duration. The interviewers had been non-clinicians which may have facilitated an pnas.1522090112 open discussion that may have been impeded in the event the interviewers had been clinicians. The study group incorporated a male health solutions researcher along with a female psychologist holding PhDs at the same time as a female academic general practitioner plus a male respiratory specialist holding MDs. A further strength of this study is that it built on a prior small-scale pilot study performed in Germany.11 Interestingly, each of the themes that had emerged in the earlier study have been also located in this study, but our data had been substantially richer along with the thematic framework was expanded to involve the new themes of `confusing/difficult content‘ and `irritating content‘. Interviews were our chosen strategy for the reason that they are additional suitable for sensitive challenges and, as opposed to focus groups, might be arranged for the comfort of every participant. Even so, group discussion may have further enriched the info generated.12?four We had expected a certain degree of respondent fatigue, as completing 3 questionnaires could possibly be perceived burdensome. Nonetheless, in reality, participants appreciated finishing the questionnaires and being able to talk at length about their knowledge. Recall bias (ie, bias introduced by participants focusing on the last completed questionnaire) was dealt with by actively encouraging respondents to PF-562271 supply feedback on all questionnaires.
共篇回复 每页10篇 页次:1/1
共篇回复 每页10篇 页次:1/1
我要回复
回复内容
验 证 码
看不清?更换一张
匿名发表 
脚注信息